Trust and quality
ClariDroits concerns a sensitive area involving health, disability, independent living, social rights and administrative procedures. This page distinguishes design objectives from human validations and versioned evidence, which remain necessary.
Human English clarity reviewed — accessibility testing pending — ClariDroits is currently a project led by Patrick François Kahouadji, before the legal entity is established.
The page language is British English (en-GB), the reference country is France and the jurisdictional context described is French. These are separate: choosing English does not select UK law or activate any French right, procedure, deadline or public availability.
Review status: Human English clarity was reviewed on 30 July 2026. Patrick approved this informational English web release. Native British English review and human accessibility validation are not claimed; no accessibility-conformance claim is made.
Public control status
The current French source describes controls that must be documented. Without dated, versioned evidence linked to a report, no status amounts to validation.
Product scope
ClariDroits aims to help people understand, prepare and organise. It must not replace professionals, provide a diagnosis or promise a decision.
Make letters and procedures easier to understand, help organise available evidence, connect relevant information and prepare useful summaries for an appointment or professional review.
ClariDroits does not make a medical diagnosis, replace a doctor, lawyer, French MDPH or CPAM, predict an application outcome or promise an entitlement or support.
Sources and traceability
Rules may change, decisions remain with competent bodies and individual situations require appropriate human review.
Every domain rule, public document or official resource must be traceable, dated and checked. Field reviews are being sought; no human validation or official partner is claimed.
The design objective is to use AI to support reading, classification and cautious rewriting. Results may contain errors and must remain explainable, correctable and verifiable.
Accessibility, privacy and local security
Accessibility, privacy and security remain areas that require scoped, dated and versioned evidence rather than broad claims.
The French source identifies RGAA, WCAG 2.2, EAA and EN 301 549 as frameworks to apply where relevant. HTML text or transcripts alone do not establish overall compliance.
The local-first objective varies by surface, function and version. Data flows, legal bases, consent, storage, access, backup, restoration, retention and deletion still need to be inventoried and qualified.
Fingerprints and reports must be attached to the version actually assessed. Testing should use fictitious or properly anonymised data, and anomalies or incidents must be documented without being treated as proof of security.
Known limitations
Qualification differs by product surface and version, and full coverage of every human situation is never claimed.
Automated testing does not replace testing with people, and platform-specific capabilities and qualification levels must remain visible.
Each claim must be linked to a version, date, scope and reviewable evidence. Statuses must distinguish an executed control, failure, non-execution and blocking without using validated unless the corresponding human evidence exists.
Publication safeguards
Key facts
Frequently asked questions
No. ClariDroits aims to help people understand and organise a case file, without replacing advice from an appropriate legal professional or a decision by a competent body.
No. The project rejects chance scores and promises. It helps identify points to check and evidence that may need strengthening.
No. No complete human accessibility validation is claimed. Relevant assistive technologies, keyboard use and zoom still require documented, versioned human testing.