Import
May use a photograph, PDF, document or user entry, depending on the platform and version.
Features
From scattered documents to an understandable situation.
The project aims to help import, understand, connect and prepare information in a case file. The presence and operation of each capability vary by surface and version; outputs may contain errors or invented information and must be reviewed.
Non-public French Alpha — capabilities to be confirmed — ClariDroits is currently a project led by Patrick François Kahouadji, before the legal structure is created.
This page is in English (locale en-GB). The reference country is France. The procedures described fall under French jurisdiction; the language does not select a jurisdiction.
Review status: Human English clarity was reviewed on 30 July 2026. Patrick approved this informational English web release. Native British English review and human accessibility validation are not claimed; no accessibility-conformance claim is made.
The journey
Four clear stages, from the document to cautious action.
The project describes an intended sequence designed to retain the source and make the next step reviewable. Its operation must be checked in the tested version.
Understand
Aim to extract facts, dates, organisations, requests and difficult terms.
Connect
Aim to build a timeline and links between documents, contradictions and supporting material.
Prepare
Aim to produce an explainable summary, questions and documents that still need checking.
Documents and domain intelligence
Read the content, then place it in the actual case file.
The original document must remain the reference throughout any tested process.
Intelligent OCR
Is intended to identify text in a photograph or PDF and help distinguish the organisation, subject, deadlines, documents and expected action.
- The original document remains the reference.
- Every transcription must be reviewed.
ClariDroits domain-specific AI
The project plans specialised rules and capabilities relating to disability, health, employment, independence, carers and social rights.
- A result may be wrong or contain invented information.
- A result is not a diagnosis, entitlement or administrative decision.
- Every result requires human review.
Document vault
Is intended to bring together useful documents, their types and dates, and their links to events in the case file.
- Storage, access, transfers and encryption must be verified for the surface.
- They must also be verified for the exact version being tested.
Case memory
Know what is established, what is missing and what has changed.
The intended design separates chronology, relationships and evolving memory. Availability and behaviour must be verified.
Timeline
Aims to place documents, decisions, appointments and changes in circumstances in a verifiable order.
Knowledge graph
Aims to connect facts, supporting material, people, organisations, events and unanswered questions.
Evolving memory
Seeks to reduce repeated work and help identify a new document, decision or contradiction; any benefit remains to be measured.
Mandatory checks
Objective: no answer should be used without checking consistency and the quality of the supporting material.
The planned checks aim to expose differences and weaknesses before a conclusion is considered. Their effectiveness remains to be verified.
Contradiction checks
Aims to compare statements across documents, including walking distance, independence, dates, decisions, needs or employment circumstances.
- the documents concerned
- the level of importance
- questions to ask before reaching a conclusion
Evidence quality
Proposes a classification to be checked — strong, medium, weak or absent — according to origin, date and connection with the stated need.
- what supports the statement
- what remains weak
- which useful document to request
Explainability
Objective: help explain why a conclusion is being proposed.
The design aims to keep important elements visible rather than hiding them behind a result.
Facts used
The elements used should be listed and distinguished from assumptions.
Evidence used
Each important fact should be connected to the documents supporting it.
Logic applied
The response should identify the domain rule or capability used.
Confidence and gaps
The confidence level and missing information should remain visible.
Platforms
A different role for each platform and version.
This division describes product intentions only. It proves neither public availability, functional equivalence nor human validation.
Desktop
Intended for working with a large case file.
- document vault
- timeline
- knowledge graph
- checks
- summaries and exports
- Alpha access and validation to be confirmed
Android
Intended for collecting and consulting information while mobile.
- photographs and imports
- reading
- a simplified journey
- case-file continuity
- Alpha access and validation to be confirmed
PWA
Intended to demonstrate the approach in a browser.
- demonstration
- an initial journey
- no guaranteed equivalence with Desktop
Essential limit
A basis for understanding and discussion, not a substitute for a competent person or organisation.
Every output may contain errors and remains subject to review.
Any information obtained through OCR, any summary and any sensitive export may be wrong and must be checked before it is used or transmitted.
ClariDroits does not replace any professional or competent organisation.
Publication safeguards
Limits that remain visible in every language
- ClariDroits is intended to explain without diagnosing and prepare without deciding.
- The original document remains the reference and every OCR transcription must be reviewed.
- The domain-specific AI may produce errors, omissions or invented information; its output is not a diagnosis, entitlement or administrative decision.
- The confidence level, missing information and supporting material should remain visible and must be checked.
- Every sensitive summary or export must be checked before transmission.
- Storage, access, transfers, encryption and feature availability must be verified for the exact surface and version.
- No public availability, functional equivalence or human validation is claimed.
- ClariDroits does not replace a professional or competent organisation.
Key facts
Clear answers about this page
- What are the four stages described for ClariDroits?
- Import, understand, connect and prepare.
- Does OCR replace the original document?
- No. The original document remains the reference and every transcription must be reviewed.
- How does ClariDroits describe evidence quality?
- The intended capability proposes a classification to be checked — strong, medium, weak or absent — according to origin, date and connection with the stated need.
- Are Desktop, Android and the PWA equivalent?
- No. The source gives them different intended roles and says that exact availability depends on the version being tested.
Frequently asked questions
Questions about this page
What does ClariDroits OCR do?
It is intended to identify text in a photograph or PDF and help distinguish the organisation, subject, deadlines, documents and expected action. The transcription may be wrong and the original document remains the reference.
Does the domain-specific AI make a diagnosis or administrative decision?
No. An AI output may contain errors or invented information, but it is not a diagnosis, entitlement or administrative decision and must be reviewed.
Are all functions available on every platform?
No. Intended roles, access, capabilities and qualification depend on the platform and exact version being considered.
Must summaries and exports be checked?
Yes. Every sensitive summary or export must be reviewed before transmission.