ClariDroits

A French project for a domain-specific AI tool intended to make complex procedures easier to understand.

The project aims to help people understand a letter, organise material and prepare a next step. Its experimental ClariDroits Access companion explores how to identify an appropriate official French service and prepare an official contact channel. Results require review, and neither component replaces professionals, public bodies or human decisions.

Non-public French Alpha — access to be confirmed — ClariDroits is currently a project led by Patrick François Kahouadji, before the legal structure is created.

This page is in English (locale en-GB). The reference country is France. The procedures described fall under French jurisdiction; the language does not select a jurisdiction.

Review status: Human English clarity was reviewed on 30 July 2026. Patrick approved this informational English web release. Native British English review and human accessibility validation are not claimed; no accessibility-conformance claim is made.

Essential functions

Intended capabilities for turning scattered information into a clearer situation.

The presence and operation of each capability vary by surface and version. Every output remains subject to review by the person or relevant professional.

Read a letter

OCR is intended to help identify the organisation, subject, dates and requested documents.

  • the source document remains the reference
  • items marked for review
  • actual data flows to be verified

Organise evidence

The project aims to bring documents, facts and missing elements together to support review.

  • provenance
  • timeline
  • confidence level

Explain the next step

The intended response separates facts, limitations and possible actions without promising an outcome.

  • explanations to verify
  • visible safeguards
  • human validation pending

ClariDroits Access

From understanding a right to identifying the appropriate official French service.

ClariDroits Access is being explored as an accessible companion and contact-path orchestrator within the non-public French Alpha. It remains limited to French services and French jurisdiction, and its behaviour and accessibility still require human field testing.

Find the appropriate official service

Access is intended to help identify an official French service according to the person’s stated need and relevant French territory.

  • France only
  • official sources must remain verified
  • no automatic legal equivalence

Understand the official contact channel

The explored journey can explain whether an official service publishes a website, secure message, form, telephone number, appointment route or postal address.

  • clear-language guidance
  • country and jurisdiction shown separately
  • contact details must remain verified

Keep the person in control

Access can prepare the next contact step, but it does not authenticate, call, send, sign, pay or submit anything on the person’s behalf.

  • explicit user action
  • no public-body decision
  • no availability or partnership promise

Who is it for?

One domain foundation with paths adapted to each role.

ClariDroits aims to reduce the documentary burden without weakening anyone’s responsibilities.

Disabled people

Understand a document and prepare a procedure at an individual pace.

  • plain explanations
  • accessibility objectives not yet validated by people
  • personal control

Carers and families

Aim to track a relative’s priorities without carrying the whole documentary burden alone.

  • organisation
  • cautious reminders
  • sharing controls to verify

Professionals and partners

Review whether a structured basis can help without replacing professional expertise.

  • sources to verify
  • separate roles
  • no official partner or validated pilot claimed

Responsible AI

Objectives for specialised, explainable assistance under human review.

ClariDroits must not act as a public authority, doctor, lawyer or automated decision engine. The effectiveness of its safeguards must be checked for each version.

Cautious

The declared objective is no diagnosis, automated decision or promise that a right will be granted.

  • uncertainty to disclose
  • facts separated from personal accounts
  • explicit limitations

Local-first

Local-first processing and user control are objectives whose actual storage and data flows must be verified for each surface and version.

  • privacy checks pending
  • transmission controls to verify
  • platform-specific capabilities

Accessibility objectives still to validate

Digital-confidence settings and functional adaptations are intended to remain separate and combinable, but they are not yet validated by people.

  • adjustable density to test
  • keyboard navigation to test
  • human accessibility validation pending

Built from lived experience

A project born from Patrick François Kahouadji’s own disability journey.

Difficulties with case files, medical certificates and disconnected information shaped one simple objective: help without taking away the power to review and decide.

A real need

Reduce administrative fatigue and make the next steps easier to understand.

  • project lead’s lived experience
  • human review sought
  • progressive improvement

Controlled development

The priority remains Alpha stabilisation, documented review and cautious international preparation.

  • non-public locale
  • transparent status
  • native British English review and human accessibility validation are not claimed

Publication safeguards

Limits that remain visible in every language

  • ClariDroits aims to help people understand, prepare and organise; it must not make decisions.
  • An AI-assisted result may contain errors or invented information and must be reviewed.
  • No diagnosis, signature or submission is presented as automated.
  • ClariDroits Access remains an experimental French Alpha companion; it does not authenticate, call, send, sign, pay or submit anything on the person’s behalf.
  • Sensitive information must not be used until storage, access, retention, security and data flows have been verified for the relevant version.
  • The project remains a non-public Alpha, with access and qualification to be confirmed and no human product, field or accessibility validation claimed.
  • The English version explains the project but provides no UK administrative workflow.

Key facts

Clear answers about this page

What does ClariDroits do?
ClariDroits aims to help people understand documents, organise material and prepare next steps relating to French disability, health and social-support procedures. Results require review.
Does ClariDroits make decisions?
No. Competent authorities and professionals retain their decisions and responsibilities.
What role is being explored for ClariDroits Access?
It is being explored as an accessible companion and contact-path orchestrator for identifying an appropriate official French service, understanding the published channel and preparing the person’s next explicit action. It remains part of a non-public French Alpha.
What is the product status?
ClariDroits is currently a project led by Patrick François Kahouadji, before the legal structure is created. It remains a non-public Alpha; access and qualification must be confirmed.
Is the English version adapted to UK law?
No. It presents the project in English without activating a UK legal or administrative workflow.

Frequently asked questions

Questions about this page

Does ClariDroits replace a French MDPH, health-insurance body, doctor or lawyer?

No. It prepares and explains information for review without replacing organisations or professionals.

Are the same features available on Android, Desktop and the PWA?

No. Capabilities and qualification levels depend on the platform and version.

Is ClariDroits Access a public body or an authorised government connector?

No. It is an experimental companion within the ClariDroits project. No public availability, official partnership, direct authentication or automatic submission is claimed.

Why not translate thousands of guides immediately?

A mass translation would be difficult to review and would distract from project priorities. This candidate starts with the defined essential explanations.