Disabled person or service user
Understand a letter, find useful documents, explain everyday life and prepare a clear summary.
- read a difficult letter
- identify procedures that need checking
- prepare a PDF for review
Use cases
These cases describe design objectives in the context of French medical and social-support procedures. They prove neither that a capability is available nor that a benefit has been measured. Outputs may be incomplete or wrong and must be reviewed; ClariDroits must not decide.
Non-public French Alpha — use cases to be evaluated — ClariDroits is currently a project led by Patrick François Kahouadji, before the legal structure is created.
This page is in English (locale en-GB). The reference country is France. The procedures described fall under French jurisdiction; the language does not select a jurisdiction.
Review status: Human English clarity was reviewed on 30 July 2026. Patrick approved this informational English web release. Native British English review and human accessibility validation are not claimed; no accessibility-conformance claim is made.
Profiles
The project aims to examine whether the same information can be organised appropriately for the person concerned, a carer or a professional.
ClariDroits does not replace medical assessment, social work or human legal analysis. Results may be incomplete or wrong and must be reviewed before any procedure.
Understand a letter, find useful documents, explain everyday life and prepare a clear summary.
Organise a relative's procedures without carrying everything alone, with a clearer view of priorities.
Examine whether the tool can reduce review time and identify points to check with the person; any benefit remains to be measured.
Bring out everyday life, routines, social participation, housing and assistive equipment.
Examine a more structured patient summary, including reported impact and documents already identified, without treating it as verified.
Work from a clearer factual basis when examining refusals, evidence and arguments that require checking.
Publication safeguards
Key facts
Frequently asked questions
The intended use case covers tracking documents, preparing appointments and identifying possible omissions. Availability and usefulness remain to be verified.
The intended use case is to help bring out mobility, independence, housing, environment, assistive equipment and the difference between what someone can do and what they actually do. The output must be reviewed.
No. It may help organise a factual basis and identify evidence or arguments to check, but it does not replace human legal analysis.