Project lead and field experience

ClariDroits is led by someone with direct experience of disability and complex procedures.

ClariDroits is currently led by Patrick François Kahouadji around one simple belief: no one should have to give up on understanding their rights because procedures are too complex, technical or exhausting.

Human English clarity reviewed — accessibility testing pending — ClariDroits is currently a project led by Patrick François Kahouadji, before the legal entity is established.

The page language is British English (en-GB), the reference country is France and the jurisdictional context described is French. These are separate: choosing English does not select UK law or activate any French right, procedure, deadline or public availability.

Review status: Human English clarity was reviewed on 30 July 2026. Patrick approved this informational English web release. Native British English review and human accessibility validation are not claimed; no accessibility-conformance claim is made.

The founder's perspective

From personal experience to a tool designed to be useful.

After experiencing difficulties with MDPH procedures, medical certificates, case files that had to be rebuilt and information that was sometimes misunderstood, Patrick François Kahouadji chose to build the tool he had been missing.

This lived experience informs ClariDroits' aims concerning accessibility, clarity and human control, which still need to be validated with the people concerned.

Founder's words

I did not create ClariDroits to make one more application, but so that I could finally use the application I would have needed during my own experience of disability.

  • Patrick François Kahouadji
  • project lead for ClariDroits

Project lead

A project grounded in direct experience of medical and social procedures.

Patrick François Kahouadji leads ClariDroits on the basis of personal and practical experience, before the legal entity is established.

What shaped the project

The need to understand letters, supporting documents, refusals, deadlines and possible appeals without replacing professionals.

Everyday reality

The approach focuses on mobility, fatigue, pain, housing, carers, employment, transport, isolation and useful evidence.

Expertise used

Software, domain structure and progressive field feedback.

The source lists the areas of expertise used to develop ClariDroits.

Software development

Software-development work for several product surfaces and PDF generation. Actual capabilities and availability must be confirmed separately for each version.

Cautious domain-specific AI

Work on a cautious domain-specific AI architecture intended to connect medical, social, administrative and legal information with everyday life.

Structured knowledge

Knowledge bases, reference guides, a glossary, life journeys and safeguards that still need to be checked.

Progressive field feedback

Reviews are being sought from disabled people, carers and professionals; no official partner or human validation is claimed.

What the project aims to improve with professionals

Clearer summaries, stronger evidence and better accessibility.

The source identifies four areas for improvement.

Readable summaries

Improve summaries used for medical, social or administrative appointments.

Relevant evidence

Identify evidence that needs strengthening without promising a decision.

Accessibility

Improve access for older people, people affected by fatigue, blind and partially sighted people, and people experiencing administrative difficulty.

Consistency with everyday life

Improve consistency between what the person actually experiences and what the case file can explain.

Transparency

Visible limitations and no suggestion of automatic institutional validation.

Public information is presented cautiously in a sensitive field.

Explicit limitations

ClariDroits makes no diagnosis, decision or promise that an outcome will be obtained.

Information to verify

Public content is informative and must be checked against official sources or with competent professionals.

Purpose of field feedback

The field feedback being sought is intended to improve the tool, its wording and journeys; it is not an institutional or acquired human validation.

Useful reference pages

Project information, evidence and presentation material.

The source points readers towards several categories of supporting material.

ClariDroits

Product presentation.

Knowledge base

Guides and resources.

Methodology

Trust and safeguards.

Citing ClariDroits

Wording and supporting material.

Partners

Field discussions.

Team

Project lead.

History

Product progress.

Press

Logos and documents.

Publication safeguards

Limits that remain visible in every language

  • ClariDroits aims to help people understand, prepare and organise.
  • ClariDroits does not replace professionals.
  • ClariDroits does not make a diagnosis.
  • ClariDroits does not make or promise a decision.
  • Public content is informative and must be checked against official sources or with competent professionals.
  • Field feedback must not be presented as automatic institutional validation.
  • No official partner or acquired product, field or accessibility validation is claimed.
  • Possible refusals, deadlines, appeals and evidence remain matters for review.

Key facts

Clear answers about this page

Who leads ClariDroits?
Patrick François Kahouadji leads ClariDroits on the basis of his own experience of disability and practical experience of medical and social procedures, before the legal entity is established.
Why was ClariDroits created?
It was created after difficulties with MDPH procedures, medical certificates, case files that had to be rebuilt and information that was sometimes misunderstood.
Has ClariDroits been validated by an administration?
No. It is a tool supporting understanding and preparation; decisions remain with competent organisations.
What areas of expertise are used?
The source lists software-development work, cautious domain-specific AI, structured knowledge resources and field reviews that are still being sought.

Frequently asked questions

Questions about this page

Who leads ClariDroits?

Patrick François Kahouadji leads ClariDroits on the basis of his own experience of disability and practical experience of medical and social procedures, before the legal entity is established.

Has ClariDroits been validated by an administration?

No. ClariDroits supports understanding and preparation. Decisions always belong to the competent organisations.

Why present the project lead and method?

Because trust is essential in a sensitive field. Readers need to understand who leads the project, its aims, its limitations and the validations still required.